o.O what did I miss...?
Posted by: Deb at May 26, 2004 10:04 PMYou'll just have to watch the rerun on Saturday (?) to find out, Deb.
Posted by: McGehee at May 26, 2004 10:12 PMUgh...this show is in trouble...I'm as big of a Trek fan as anybody, and I think we're in deep doodoo...
Posted by: Matt Hurley at May 26, 2004 10:20 PMI loved it.
It was probably the best trek cliffhanger since Best of Both Worlds.
Nobody expected a cliffhanger...nobody knew there was even going to be a season four until late last week.
Oh! lol I missed reading the title... saw "Illinois Nazis" and I.was.worried. *duh* I'll have to watch for the replay saturday :)
Posted by: Deb at May 26, 2004 11:49 PMYou didn't misread my comment.
The quote fits. Take my word for it.
Posted by: mhking at May 26, 2004 11:55 PMI REALLY wish this would have ended the series on a high note. The mission successed, but at a cost, and the NX-01 is put in mothballs.
Nope, this show has to prove how good it is at pulling defeat from the edge of victory.
Posted by: frinklin at May 27, 2004 02:20 AMYawn. Time travel, again, apparently.
How many times did Captain Kirk and crew go back in time? No more than four or five, certainly (including ST:IV, and only half of those were danger-of-changing-history situations.
By contrast, the writers of Star Trek have become increasingly reliant upon time travel as a plot device as the various series have progressed. With Archer and Daniels zipping to and from the 26th century practically every other episode, Jim Kirk will have the opportunity to read his entire captain's log by the time he makes ensign.
Come on, guys, come up with something original to base a cliffhanger on.
Posted by: Scott McClare at May 27, 2004 04:12 PMA good cliffhanger would have Scott Bakula "leaping" to his next mission. :)
Posted by: Rabbit at May 28, 2004 08:48 AM